Fluids pages[]
When was the
| “ | If a mod has more than 3 similar fluids in it, they should all be documented on a single page. | „ |
thing decided upon? -- SatanicSantaFTB Wiki Admin 19:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- If memory serves you decided it shortly after I made the IC2 fluids page. Chocohead Nag• Edits• Staff 20:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Proposed Addition: 4.11 Known Bugs[]
Following a discussion in Discord and some various thoughts in the back of my head, we should probably actually write out the policy for this.
The Question: Should pages include documentation of known bugs within mods?
The Proposal: Add a section to the ACG, section 4.11: Bugs and Known Issues
“
”
This is not a section to include on most pages. If a mod is still in active development, bugs in it should be reported to its developer for correction and should not be documented here. However, if all development on a mod has ended, and bugs or issues are discovered, this section is for documenting those issues. This may include the steps taken to replicate the issue, or a way to work around the issue.
-Paladin One (AH) ... nerd? 18:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- So I realized it fit better in Standard Appendices and Footers, and BOLDly put it there. -Paladin One (AH) ... nerd? 09:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)