Tag: Source edit |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | == Minecraft Forum links == |
||
| ⚫ | More than four years ago, I started working on a [[ftbw:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] that was not complete. Just today, there has been [[community:User blog:MisterWoodhouse/Introducing the Wiki Rules and Blocking Policy|a post]] on FANDOM's new blocking policies. The key takeaway from their announcement is that they don't want admins blocking people for stupid reasons. [https://ftb.gamepedia.com/Special:Log/block?page=User%3AXbony2 While this has not been much of a problem here], most bans are reasonable and there haven't really been any controversial bans since the pre-Gamepedia times, it also states that '''"Rules for your wikis must be defined and easily found. These rules must not violate Fandom’s Terms of Use or be overly restrictive."''' I see this request of something of a liability kind of thing for FANDOM in that I don't expect to them to clamp down on wikis that haven't done this (like ours), unless problems arise from said wikis. Seems like this is unlikely to be a major issue but it would be good to formalize our blocking policy regardless. Feel free to suggest any direction you think this policy should take, or just contribute to it directly since it's in a draft state right now. [[User:Xbony2|-Xbony2]] ([[User talk:Xbony2|talk]]) 05:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
| − | This wiki has lots of references to topics on Minecraft Forum. In order to keep things accurate and safe, I suggest the following: |
||
| − | * Replace all HTTP links with HTTPS (essentially batch replace string <code>http://www.minecraftforum.net/</code> with <code>https://www.minecraftforum.net/</code> on all articles) |
||
| − | * Since Minecraft Forum will [https://www.minecraftforum.net/news/60727-important-minecraft-forum-archive-announcement soon become read-only], how about appending the word "archived" to links that refer to it? |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | *Regarding your second point, I figured it would be wise to tell everyone that [https://www.minecraftforum.net/news/60728-a-new-and-exciting-beginning it isn’t going into Read Only]. Regarding your first point, this may or may not be needed as HTTP is usually converted to HTTPS in modern browsers. [[User:Tomodachi94|Tomodachi94]] ([[User talk:Tomodachi94|talk]]) 11:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
| − | == |
+ | ==JavaRogers for Editor== |
| + | I nominate {{U|JavaRogers}} for their work on the [[Feed The Beast Wiki:Immersive Engineering project|Immersive Engineering project]]. Some other people probably should be nominated too but I haven't played as much attention as I should. [[User:Xbony2|-Xbony2]] ([[User talk:Xbony2|talk]]) 18:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * {{Support}}. This is the only candidate for editor role right now, owing to their very high quality edits, and a clear plan to update info about Immersive Engineering to its latest version, something we need to do to other mods as well. - [[User:Astroflux|<span style="color:lightgray">'''Astro'''</span><span style="color:red">'''Flux'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Astroflux|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Astroflux|contributions]]) 14:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
| + | * {{Against}}. Did not send me cute bunny gifs. {{User:Retep998/Signature}} 15:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | * {{Support}}. Considering myself and some of my colleagues have not been active as of late, we need someone to ensure we keep creating new, quality content. —Tomodachi94 (<sub>[[User:Tomodachi94|View]]</sub>·<sup>[[User talk:Tomodachi94|Talk]]</sup>|<sub>[[Feed_The_Beast_Wiki:FTB_Wiki_Roles#Roles|Editor]]</sub>) 17:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
| + | ** On another note, should we start notifying potential nominees on their talk pages? —Tomodachi94 (<sub>[[User:Tomodachi94|View]]</sub>·<sup>[[User talk:Tomodachi94|Talk]]</sup>|<sub>[[Feed_The_Beast_Wiki:FTB_Wiki_Roles#Roles|Editor]]</sub>) 17:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
| + | ===Results=== |
||
| − | I'm sure many of you know who [[User:SuntannedDuck2|SuntannedDuck2]] is. Duck has made many excellent edits, including initializing the [[LightningCraft]] page as well as others. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | *{{Neutral}} I feel that SuntannedDuck2 might benefit from not being editor for a little while longer and focusing on high-quality edits with better grammatical writing and/or double-checking flow of sentences before publishing an edit. -- [[User:SizableShrimp|<span style="color:orange">SizableShrimp🦐</span>]] ([[User talk:SizableShrimp|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/SizableShrimp|contribs]]) 04:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | More than four years ago, I started working on a [[ftbw:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] that was not complete. Just today, there has been [[community:User blog:MisterWoodhouse/Introducing the Wiki Rules and Blocking Policy|a post]] on FANDOM's new blocking policies. The key takeaway from their announcement is that they don't want admins blocking people for stupid reasons. [https://ftb.gamepedia.com/Special:Log/block?page=User%3AXbony2 While this has not been much of a problem here], most bans are reasonable and there haven't really been any controversial bans since the pre-Gamepedia times, it also states that '''"Rules for your wikis must be defined and easily found. These rules must not violate Fandom’s Terms of Use or be overly restrictive."''' I see this request of something of a liability kind of thing for FANDOM in that I don't expect to them to clamp down on wikis that haven't done this (like ours), unless problems arise from said wikis. Seems like this is unlikely to be a major issue but it would be good to formalize our blocking policy regardless. Feel free to suggest any direction you think this policy should take, or just contribute to it directly since it's in a draft state right now. [[User:Xbony2|-Xbony2]] ([[User talk:Xbony2|talk]]) 05:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:25, 7 July 2021
 | This page is for posting information and issues that affect administrators. Issues appropriate for this page could include: General announcements, discussion of administration methods, ban proposals, block reviews, page protection, merging page histories, mass deletion of a user's contribution, adminship, and backlog notices. |
| Old notices will moved to the archive: 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 Note dates are by archival time, not necessarily by discussion time. |
Blocking policy
More than four years ago, I started working on a Blocking policy that was not complete. Just today, there has been a post on FANDOM's new blocking policies. The key takeaway from their announcement is that they don't want admins blocking people for stupid reasons. While this has not been much of a problem here, most bans are reasonable and there haven't really been any controversial bans since the pre-Gamepedia times, it also states that "Rules for your wikis must be defined and easily found. These rules must not violate Fandom’s Terms of Use or be overly restrictive." I see this request of something of a liability kind of thing for FANDOM in that I don't expect to them to clamp down on wikis that haven't done this (like ours), unless problems arise from said wikis. Seems like this is unlikely to be a major issue but it would be good to formalize our blocking policy regardless. Feel free to suggest any direction you think this policy should take, or just contribute to it directly since it's in a draft state right now. -Xbony2 (talk) 05:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
JavaRogers for Editor
I nominate JavaRogers for their work on the Immersive Engineering project. Some other people probably should be nominated too but I haven't played as much attention as I should. -Xbony2 (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Support. -Xbony2 (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Support. This is the only candidate for editor role right now, owing to their very high quality edits, and a clear plan to update info about Immersive Engineering to its latest version, something we need to do to other mods as well. - AstroFlux (talk) (contributions) 14:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)- Against. Did not send me cute bunny gifs. 🐇Retep998🐇🐰Bunny Overlord🐰 15:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Considering myself and some of my colleagues have not been active as of late, we need someone to ensure we keep creating new, quality content. —Tomodachi94 (View·Talk|Editor) 17:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Results
Sorry for the delay. Passes. -Xbony2 (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)