User talk:188.67.83.205

Thanks for your contributions - however, the primary purpose of documenting mods is not making recipe pages. Everyone uses either JEI for 1.10+ or NEI for 1.7 and lower - they can check the recipe without leaving the game, and they are definitely not going to a wiki to get recipes. Not to mention, making base pages with crafting recipes is mostly automated for us with HuesoDeWiki - a single press of  makes a page I can fill with details.

The main point is documenting what the blocks and items in question do and how to use them, not how they are crafted. -- Hubry  (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Maybe someone will add there after page is created, it's less obsticle to make something in it. 188.67.83.205 21:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * While it gets the ball rolling, it'd be nice more information about its functions and stuff. Please consult Article creation guideline. Your contributions are highly appreciated! --SirMoogle (talk) 03:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No wonder people aren't creating articles, ftb wiki seems to have so high demands about how article should be like. Maybe mention should be considered article with little is better than no article at all. 176.93.143.211 16:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * While someone else can fill in the blanks, we do try and maintain standards throughout our articles, as some of the content submitted can be unclear and would be best elaborated on beforehand so other users can understand how a block or mechanic works. --SirMoogle (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I generally don't delete articles with little information, just if it's so little that it isn't useful. For example, just the recipe isn't useful but some info, even if small, could be. Imperfect pages are generally marked with Stub or Incomplete or whatnot as needed, so we can go back and improve them later. -Xbony2 (talk) 22:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * And maintaining sometimes seems to mean, even if article is stub, you remove information from it just to make more close to standard. 87.95.11.227 09:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The information that is being added isn't meaningful to anyone else. It does not explain how the item works, even as an example. --SirMoogle (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Could you fix scanner and builder links down in RFTools mod blocks? 188.67.83.205 21:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Is purge command to do it? 87.95.11.227 09:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I kind of though SirMoogle took care of all the stuff but if you're referring to the navbox linking to disambiguation pages that is now fixed. Purge might be needed on a few pages but maybe not. -Xbony2 (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)