User:Xbony2/FAQ

The above is more appropriate for general wiki questions, this FAQ mainly contains questions specific to me and my views

Q: How can I contact you?
 * A: Please see User:Xbony2.

Q: Are you male or female? [or non-binary or something?]
 * A: You can't really make very good assumptions on the Internet... and I do have that purple heart which might be perceived as feminine... and I might react positively to guys flirting with me... so this is a fair question to ask. I am a cisgender man.

Q: Are you single?
 * A: Um, yes, at the time of writing I am. If you want to go on a virtual date with me we can play Minecraft together maybe :P

Q: What is your favorite XYZ?
 * A: I made a list of all of my favorite things on this page.

Q: Can you document mod XYZ? / How do you decide to document what mods?
 * A: Well... different wiki editors might mind but I don't think there's any harm in asking the earlier question. However, I have my own agenda and I probably won't document what you ask. The mods I document usually revolve around a number of factors:
 * Newer versions: (1.12 in particular at the moment) I think focusing on the newer mods on the versions of Minecraft will be more helpful in the long run over documenting something in 1.7.10, where maybe there is still a large userbase, but that userbase is slowly disappearing. Also more mods on 1.7.10 are documented already, not necessarily here but in other places, whereas information on the newer content is more scattered.
 * How established a mod is: although I think I might enjoy documenting AppleMilkTea just as much as Actually Additions, I'd rather focus on mods that more users would want documentation for. Popularity is not my only focus when choosing to document a mod, but I think it would be hard to argue that being able to please more people isn't an altruistic goal.
 * How much I like a mod: I'm pretty sure this is obvious. I don't get paid (see next question); this is a hobby for me and I do whatever the fuck I want and don't you forget it. Seriously though, I dislike a lot of mainstream mods, and although I'd like to see documentation on all mods, I don't exactly plan to do everything myself. This includes some mods like Tinkers' Construct and Blood Magic and Applied Energistics 2, I'm not exactly your average player (or much of a player at all, I mostly just focus on documentation). This is probably one of the biggest factors.
 * My relationship with the mod author: I don't really talk to many mod authors to be honest, but one example of this would be me and Ellpeck; while we were dating Actually Additions documentation was certainly prioritized and as we are still good friends it still is prioritized :P This isn't necessarily just about personal relationships, having a mod author's endorsement means a lot. If you are a mod author and want me to document your mod, hit me up. maybe we can become friends and develop a personal relationship and then you can abuse me for documentation And of course, this could be a negative factor if I hate some mod author's guts, although fortunately I can't think of any examples for that.
 * Existing wiki documentation: this won't necessarily stop me, but if a mod is already decently documented on say for example, two other wiki, I feel like my newly created documentation wouldn't be as used and valued. I view one of the main goals of this wiki is to be a central repository of all modded Minecraft information (see a few questions down) but realistically I'd prefer to focus on the mods that need new documentation more.

Q: Do you get paid? Do you get any form of compensation or recognition for your work?
 * A: I do not get paid. There is no Gamepedia or FTB staff that contributes to this wiki and gets paid (well, contributes as in writes content for us, I wouldn't count Gamepedia updating extensions and whatnot). This is one aspect about wiki editing that is perhaps disappointing compared to modding; a mod author can get money from CurseForge but wikis don't have any similar system. The ads on this wiki mainly go towards hosting fees and to pay Gamepedia staff so they can continue to maintain create wikis. This aspect does have its benefits however; in my opinion, with money out of the way contributors can contribute for the good of the community or for fun without the green taint having the potential to lower quality in favor of increasing bulk. Anyway, I'm getting a bit off topic...
 * I have received recognition for my work in other ways. In a giveaway in November 2015 to the top 100 editors (ranked by wikipoints), the Gamepedia Team sent me a package with a tee-shirt and a Hydra plushie and a mug and some other things like that (nothing über fancy but nice of them nevertheless. Also included a back scratcher that thought was a fork or something). The Gamepedia Team made me editor of the month for August of 2016 (awarded a bit late, but still) and I received a striking similar package for that, although this package had a cool trophy :3 I have two Hydra plushies which is cool. If you want one, I'm willing to sell one for the starting price of $2500. I've helped various Gamepedia editors and I think I have some respect as a wiki veteran within the Gamepedia community.
 * In the modded community I don't think I'm well recognized. I may call myself "the Vazkii of wiki documentation," but obviously I'm not as recognized as Vazkii. Not that I'd expect to be, but not getting much thanks for your work sucks a bit. Although perhaps that is nice in a way; I know some modders would rather not be so famous. If you want to work with modded Minecraft while avoiding some of toxicity of the community, maybe consider contributing to this wiki? Anyway, I do have *some* recognition, which is nice, even if some or maybe most of it stems from older projects (Nuclear Control 2 and others). I was featured on an episode of Behind the Mod by Amaxter (it was a bit awkward since I was pretty nervous and I'm slightly socially awkward x) but good nevertheless). I am also a member of All The Creators although not particularly active.
 * I was offered a wiki-related job once! I won't say for what company but it was pretty exciting. Turned it down. I can't take up a job currently because of high school, and also the professional/job mentality is a bit of a scary concept for me (I've never had a job before).

Q: Can I donate to you? Is there any way I can give to you?
 * A: At the present moment I don't accept donations. I'm in high school and lucky enough to not need to pay for a roof over my head. I don't spend my own money very much. I'm a minor still (but not for much longer!) so legally I cannot set up a PayPal anyway. I get some money from my projects on CurseForge; it's enough to buy an occasional game on Steam (or sponsor an editathon or two), and right now that's all I need. Giving me money won't really make my life easier or give more time to focus on documentation. If you want to help me out another way, contributing to the wiki is pretty nice I hear. Linking the wiki in places would be nice; even if it's not your official source of information, if we have a pretty good section on a particular mod, a link on CurseForge has the potential to be helpful for us.
 * Although, um, before donating slips your mind completely, I do believe my fellow wiki editor accepts donations via his Patreon. At the present moment he's the only active editor that accepts donations, so if you want to go that route I encourage you to donate to him. I also encourage your donation message to be something about encouraging him to contribute to the wiki and maybe also it could make fun of him for being white. that's a joke btw I'm also white

Q: Why document a mod if it already has documentation?
 * A: Well, one might not really think about it, but all mods at least have some documentation. Of course, this documentation can range anywhere from a brief CurseForge description to an outdated mod spotlight made in Portuguese to a well-written in-game manual. Heck, if you think about it, the name of a mod is a form of documentation. But obviously we're moving a little bit too far away from the point that this question makes, so anyway...
 * Part of the reason for this is that a mod's documentation might not be that great. I don't want to insult any mod authors, but some overvalue their documentation. Some documentation might not contain any information on the numbers in the mod, some may described their content ambiguously. Sometimes they do this purposely; in-game documentation is often used not to explain everything in precise detail, but rather to get users started and for them to learn the mod as they go. This is a fun approach, but this is not how we do things on this wiki; we give as much information as possible, if you want to be spoiled then come be spoiled. Some in-game sources might be a pain in the butt to navigate. Ever use the Tinkers' Construct manuals in 1.5.2? There was no search. You had to flip through every page until you found what you were looked for. That is, if you found it at all, maybe it's in the other two books! Oh, and also, the moment you close that book you lose your place. If you want to go back to where you were, better start flipping! God damn that was awful. Plenty of users prefer the wiki format to other forms of documentation; some people despise wikis and that's okay too (not that okay though, those people should be screwed if you asked me! /s)
 * One of the main goals of the FTB Wiki, in my opinion, is to have information on all of modded Minecraft, in one place, in one consistent format. Ideally one should be able to look up whatever they want without going through a hundred different in-game manuals, a hundred different independent wiki, a hundred different YouTube videos, or a hundred different times just figuring it out yourself. This is the ultimate goal of the FTB Wiki; to be the wiki to end all wikis. Obviously there's a lot of work to do, but it is a goal we have.
 * And also... because it's fun! Not very altruistic but I might document mod XYZ because I like it. If I really like some mod, I don't think it's so evil if I want to go through it and document it, even if it is already documented on some other wiki. This is a hobby after all.

Q: Why do you edit this wiki instead of ftbwiki.org?
 * A: The real reason is because I joined this wiki and started contributing to it first. But if you mean the question in more of the nature of "why would someone (maybe me) want to contribute to this wiki instead of that wiki?" I can answer that too. Personally, I find that this wiki is faster, a bit cleaner under the hood, looks nicer, has more active users, allows for translations (even if it's not the perfect system at the moment) and has more documentation on the newer versions. Btw, on the topic of looks, if you prefer dark themes, you can actually set this wiki to use a dark theme! more info here However, although one might define our two wikis as rivals, I'd rather focus on improving this wiki rather than "beating" the other wiki or always comparing ourselves to the wiki or whatnot. I can't say I'm not competitive at all, but being focusing on competition feels like a misuse of energy to me. And anyway, I don't think it's really that easy to say one wiki is better than the other. Comparing two wikis really isn't as easy as one might think it is; statistics are skewed for various reasons (more on that later) and other comparable factors can often boil down to personal preference.

Q: Why is this wiki hosted on Gamepedia? Isn't Curse evil or something?
 * A: Say whatever you want about the rest of Curse, but I've had a generally good experience with Gamepedia. To be perfectly honest, the FTB-Curse partnership is, in my opinion, the best thing that happened to this wiki and why it's even relevant today. Note I didn't say anything about the rest of FTB, I really don't care about FTB, live or die I could care less as long as the wiki is doing good.
 * If you disagree, just ask anyone who was around when the wiki was self-hosted, when simply visiting a RedPower 2 page could crash the entire wiki. Nobody sane has ever said "man, I wish I could go back to that!" The Gamepedia Team has never forced anything on us and has pretty much left us to manage our wiki, only stepping in when asked for assistance. Everyone in the Gamepedia Slack community has been pretty friendly, it's an awesome community to be part of and a family almost. The employees seemingly act like normal people and not like robots, and there's not been any business awkwardness or anything. You can ask any wiki admin if they regret moving to Gamepedia and I'd argue they'd 99% of the time say no lol compare that shit with Wikia . I don't want to say everything is perfect, but it's been pretty good. You can point me to past controversies all you want, but I've had a really good experience dealing with them (and I've had a lot of experience too, I know what I'm talking about, I've made like >40k edits to Gamepedia wikis for I dunno like three years). I don't know about the rest of Curse, but Gamepedia's been pretty good as far as I am concerned. If FTB ever plans to abandon Gamepedia, it will very unlikely be with the approval of the majority of the wiki editors here, and it will certainly not be with my approval.

Q: Would you be interested in working at my company, Company XYZ, for a paid job?
 * A: LIKE THIS WOULD EVER HAPPEN Well um, I'd love to, assuming it's a real job and not some sketchy commission (hey join my modding team I'll give you 10% of the profit) and I don't really dislike your company for some reason (*cough* Wikia). However, I am still in high school and not able to commit to a professional schedule. I'd prefer to spend what little time I have on being healthy and things I find enjoyable and ideally stressless. Thanks for your hypothetical offer, though.