Talk:Rainbow.png

What is the importance/relevance of this article's subject? --  Satanic Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 02:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's something the mod author doesn't want you to know. We cannot allow big brother to censor us, we must stand up for ourselves and make a fight. -Xbony2 (talk) 09:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * So it is not important then. FSP and EI have dozens of resources that are not used anywhere but we don't document those. --  Satanic Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 16:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * In my opinion documentation should only cover things relevant to users of the mod. Resources inside the mod that are inaccessible in game are not worthy of documentation. 16:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Agree --  Satanic Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 16:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think if it is only optional, and it's not harming the documentation of any other part of the mod (or other mods for that matter), then there is nothing wrong with doing it. It's mod related even if it's not actually used.  Chocohead Nag • Edits • Staff 16:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If we started documenting unused resources, I'd have to document over 40 FSP textures that would all say basically the exact same thing as this article. Just saying. --  Satanic Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 16:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hence you keep it optional. If people want to that's fine but it's not a requirement for a mod to be considered well documented/finished.  Chocohead Nag • Edits • Staff 16:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I really don't see the point in having an article about something that has no purpose for existing followed by speculation with 0 evidence. --  Satanic Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 16:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's an interesting easter egg. I don't see the big deal. -Xbony2 (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No. The article says it is "likely" an easter egg. I looked into its history on Git and it's hardly interesting. I couldn't find anything else about it anywhere. --  Satanic Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 19:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's pretty hard to argue it's not an easter egg :P and what is interesting is rather subjective; I think it's interesting, which is why I decided to documented it. -Xbony2 (talk) 20:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)