MediaWiki talk:Sidebar

Untitled

 * Done --  Satanic Santa F T B Wiki Admin 22:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

cap
"Staff's noticeboard", "Admin's Noticeboard"? -Xbony2 (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Done --  Satanic Santa F T B Wiki Admin 17:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed modifications
Using gets the count of the current page. So when used in templates, it gets the count of the current page (like 1 on Frevinite Hoe... or an error on Special:RecentChanges). Remember santa, you MADE this extension for the purpose to get rid of the noinclude nonsense in the noticeboards; it needs a target and not some other templatized nonsense. (reason x why I should be administrator) (also the AN is repeated, that's kind of stupid) -Xbony2 (talk) 22:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Modifications
This page is bureaucrat-protected, which is stupid, I don't even know why that's a thing, but we might as well discuss some of the changes that I shall proposal. -Xbony2 (talk) 00:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Top "navigation" section
 * Remove the counter from the centralized discussion, just keep the counter in the discussions section. On my browser, maybe other people's browsers too, it goes onto a new line and just looks dumb.
 * Removed recent translations. I'm the translation administrator and I don't even use this, so I suspect nobody else uses it.
 * Add a link to Discord
 * Add a link to IRC
 * Discussions and bulletins. Just rename it to "discussions."
 * Simplify each by removing "discussion" or "noticeboard," such as "Centralized discussion (17)" -> "Centralized (17)", "Bot operators' noticeboard (0)" -> "Bot operators' (0)", etc.
 * Remove the community bulletin board. This is page is now only of historical interest.
 * Admin Toolbox. Rename it with a lowercase "t" maybe?
 * Remove the counter from the admin's noticeboard.
 * Add hydradark stylesheet I suppose?
 * I agree with everything you've said here. thoughts? --  Satanic  Santa 🎅F T B Wiki Admin 06:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything? I'm almost disappointed we don't have any small details to argue about. -Xbony2 (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * bump., if you say nothing we'll assume you approve. -Xbony2 (talk) 16:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * How dare you assume anything. I am fine with these changes, but not with you assuming my approval. 00:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * How dare you assume I was assuming your approval. But seriously, saying nothing when asked for your opinion either displays ignorance about being asked or that you feel a lack of necessity to response. In the case of the second, chances are you approve or are apathetic. If you felt that this action had negative consequence, surely you would attempt to intervene? I am merely pinging you in case it is the first, but in the hypothetical situation you did not respond, what can we do but assume the second and move on? -Xbony2 (talk) 01:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)