Feed The Beast Wiki talk:Extremely Scary Editathon

Voting
The editathon is over. I have not written about the outcome because I am lazy sack of shit (I'll work on it, mkay). As you all know, the real winner is the wiki and the community that uses the wiki, but whoever gets the prize is kind of like the realer winner if you ask me.

Anyway, as per the rules (which I encourage you to reread)...
 * The following users can be voted for:, ,
 * The following users can vote:, , ,

There's a few users who I thought would be on this list, but they did not get over 20 edits. If one of these users was you, then I apologize, but the cutoff will be enforced regardless. Perhaps next editathon I'll make a looser set of rules or maybe the time table a day larger.

If you're going to opt out, please tell me asap (there's not a lot of people to vote for so I encourage you to keep your hat in the race). The voting ends November 7th (since I didn't write this right away, it's extended a day).

Voting is done on this page! For simplicities' sake, please structure your vote like the following: Place this after this comment/the other votes. You don't have to provide a reason why you voted for who you voted for, but I highly encourage you to.
 * , for his hard work documenting GregTech 4. ~

Remember that you can't vote for yourself, and you can't win anything if you don't vote. Additionally, please vote for the participant with "the most contributions of both quality and quantity"! This might not necessarily be the person with the most edits or most pages made, and this might not necessarily be your best buddy. I highly encourage you to go through your fellow editathoners' contributions to see what they did. -Xbony2 (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)


 * , since Enchantments are often difficult to get such complete information for. Canis Artorus (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)